Monday, 1 December 2008


It is official...coalition a done deal

Letter below signed by all three opposition leaders with seats in the House of Commons. The coalition agreement is now official and it is a matter of time before we are defeated and a coup takes place in the House of Commons. Stephane Dion will soon be Prime Minister rather Canadians voted for him or not. God help our country. The economy is now in the hands of Stephane Dion and his coalition of socialists and separatists. All because the parties who lost the last election have decided this is what is in the best interests of Canadians even though they all campaigned against this coalition idea in an election six weeks ago. The government will have no mandate or legitimacy but will be in power nonetheless.

Now Bob Rae is right there is no turning back. This coalition is now responsible for all wrong with the economy not Harper and the Conservative Party anymore. In the next election there will be a two party system. Opposition vs. Incumbants. Liberals can no longer say the NDP doesn't understand the economy with any kind of credibility. NDP can no longer call Liberals arrogant or right wing. Neither the NDP nor Liberals can campaign negatively against the Bloc Quebecois or say working with them threatens national unity. Frankly they are now all the same party and will all go into the next election with identical records. Blue Liberals no longer have a place in their party (but would be welcome in ours as the only party not on the extreme left). Federalist and economic credentials within the Liberal Party are now suspect and questionable because of this arrangement. Federal Liberals have proven that they are in fact an arrogant power driven party that lacks any kind of identifiable principle. What they have demonstrated today is that they haven't learned from their sense of entitlement exposed during the sponsorship scandal that forced them out of power to begin with.

If this coalition falls a part or turns out to be a disaster, Canadians will only have one option to replace all of them with - the Conservative Party. The question now is, what kind of country will be left by the time we finally face the people and earn our majority and role in government? What does this mean for Harper's leadership? What is the fastest way we can bring this dangerous alliance down? What exactly has been promised to the separatists to guarantee their support for 18 months? Who will be the next Prime Minister in May assuming this coalition lasts that long before an election is called?

Today is a sad day to be a Canadian. Our vote no longer counts in this country. Canadians who say they have lost faith in all politicians would be tough to argue with right now.
-Darryl

**

Globe and Mail Update

Liberal Party Press Office

New Democratic Party Press Office

Bloc Québécois Press Office

Monday, December 1, 2008

To our fellow citizens,

Canada is facing a global economic crisis. Since the recent federal election, it has become clear that the government headed by Stephen Harper has no plan, no competence and, no will to effectively address this crisis. Therefore, the majority of Parliament has lost confidence in Mr. Harper's government, and believes that the formation of a new Government that will effectively, prudently, promptly and competently address these critical economic times is necessary.

The contrast between the inaction of Mr. Harper's government and the common action taken by all other Western democracies is striking. We cannot accept this.

A majority of Canadians and Quebecers voted for our parties on October 14, 2008. Our Members of Parliament make up 55 per cent of the House of Commons.

In light of the critical situation facing our citizens, and the Harper government's unwillingness and inability to address the crisis, we are resolved to support a new government that will address the interests of the people.

Today we respectfully inform the Governor General that, as soon as the appropriate opportunity arises, she should call on the Leader of the Official Opposition to form a new government, supported as set out in the accompanying accords by all three of our parties.

Respectfully,

Hon. Stéphane Dion Leader,

the Liberal Party of Canada

Hon. Jack Layton Leader,

the New Democratic Party of Canada

Gilles Duceppe Leader,

the Bloc Québécois


Blast from the Past: Liberal 2006 attack ad about Harper and the Bloc

Click here to see it. And Liblogs are calling us hypocritical...

Quote from the 2006 Liberal campaign ad against "Harper and the Bloc".

"Gilles Duceppe and Stephen Harper worked together to bring down the government. Lots of late night secret meetings. Apparently, they're quite a team. Which is great. Because if Harper wins this election? He'll have to work very, very closely with Duceppe. Unfortunately, their unity won't do much for Canada's unity."

Funny how what was scary for unity in 2006 is now what is best for Canadians in 2008.
-Darryl


Breaking News: Dion will lead the coalition

Apparently he received unanimous consent among Liberal MPs. They also say they have agreed on a 30 billion dollar stimulus package with the other two opposition parties. Three questions...

Will Dion implement the carbon tax he campaigned on six weeks ago?

Is it true that Liberals have agreed to raise corporate taxes 50 billion dollars to secure NDP support?

What has been promised to the separatists?

Raising taxes on Canadian corporations that provide jobs, a carbon tax on individuals and a government that requires separatist support on every issue does not give me much confidence. Somehow I am not sure that all of this is the solution to our economic troubles in Canada.

-Darryl

Good! The three opposition parties are being proactive, and are drafting a letter to the Governor General to inform her that an alternative government is possible if the current government loses a vote of confidence in the House. And the Bloc will support the Liberal-NDP coalition (the People’s Coalition Party?).

But does the letter go far enough?

The Cat does not think so.

“The three opposition leaders are drafting a letter to Governor-General Michaëlle Jean in which they formally call on her to allow the formation of a coalition government if the Conservatives are defeated in the House of Commons next week.

Opposition sources said Monday the drafting of the letter is at an advanced stage, and will be made public with the agreement of the leadership of the Liberal Party, the New Democratic Party and the Bloc Québécois.

The goal is to inform Ms. Jean that a viable alternative to the current government exists within the current Parliament, in the form of a coalition between the Liberal Party and the NDP. The Bloc is expected to promise to support the coalition to survive for at least a year, which would allow for the passage of two budgets.”

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20081201.wPOLcoalition1201/BNStory/politics/home?cid=al_gam_mostview

I think the letter should also address the issue of a request by Harper to prorogue the parliament before next Monday, so as to buy time and avoid having the MPs elected by voters a few weeks ago, debate in Parliament the methods to be used to protect Canadians against the worst international recession in fifty years (as the PM said).

Change the letter to add the proroguing portion, and make sure the letter gets to the GG pronto, say by tomorrow, to forestall an end run around Parliament by Harper.


First Question in the House of Commons for Prime Minister Ignatieff or Prime Minister Dion

In the event of a coalition, all opposition questions should focus on the legitimacy of any proposed coalition government. Here are two potential questions for Prime Minister Ignatieff or Prime Minister Dion should this coalition actually happen. Liberals feel free to use the comment section to try and come up with an answer.
-Darryl

Prime Minister Ignatieff:

"Mr. Speaker, the current Canadian Prime Minister has lived most of his life outside of Canada, has limited experience in the House of Commons and was not elected leader of his own party by Liberal members or Prime Minister by Canadian voters. Mr. Prime Minister...who has given you a mandate to sit in that chair?"

Prime Minister Dion:

"Mr. Speaker, the current Prime Minister was clearly rejected by the Canadian voters in the last election. Among all leaders he consistently polled as the worst option to become Prime Minister. His party finished at their lowest levels since confederation. Only 26% of Canadians voted for him and his party. He lacks confidence even within his own party. To the Prime Minister - what gives you a mandate to serve in that role and how can any Canadian have confidence in your weak leadership during these tough economic times?"

First opposition day motions:

"The Canadian House of Commons recognizes Quebec as a province within a united Canada"

"The Canadian government reaffirms its support of the Afghanistan mission until 2011."

How will the BQ vote on the first one? How would the NDP vote on the second one?
-Darryl


NDP and Liberals reach a deal but is Iggy onside?

It appears the NDP and Liberals have reached a deal on a coalition, but is Michael Ignatieff on side? It appears he might be getting cold feet knowing it is most likely that he will lead the Liberals into the next election and is starting to see the consequences of what this unholy alliance could mean for the next campaign. If Igantieff or any of the other leadership candidates are smart, they would let Dion be leader. I would not want my leadership tarred by working with the Bloc Quebecois and the socialists. I would also be afraid to take leadership during a time of economic crisis where the inevitable deficits, increased unemployment and other economic indicators are sure to impact the popularity of whoever is the Canadian Prime Minister over these next few months. If I am Michael Ignatieff I would also be afraid of Question Period where his legitimacy to serve as Prime Minister would be heavily attacked.

With a lack of Conservative support on any issue, it is clear that the Bloc, NDP and Liberals will be forced to agree on everything to get something accomplished. If the coalition agreement only means that the BQ will support the government on confidence votes, than the consequence of that means nothing will get passed except on confidence votes or unless the Bloc supports the legislation. Committees will be disfunctional. Western premiers would be angry about their lack of influence in the new government. World leaders might be confused about who is running the show in Canada. Protests are possible. The Liberal leader at the head of the coalition would be forced to give in to extortion from the NDP and Bloc Quebecois at every turn or else they would face an election as the alternative. Michael Ignatieff is a smart man and I believe he wants no part of this coalition. A good friend of mine posted on his facebook that for the cost of 30 million dollars Flaherty has managed to unite the left. That is probably true, but I would also argue that the price of this coalition may be a Conservative majority that up until now has not been possible. Any Liberal west of Ontario knows full well they would be toast if they were part of a coup that completely reduced all influance in the West and replaced it with a government controlled by 69 Quebec MPs with 50 of them representing a separatist party. Does the NDP want to keep their seat in Alberta? The opposition has a choice, power now illegitimately for a period of time with the consequence being opposition for a generation after the next election or they can rebuild and earn power through democratic means. I predict Liberals will take the quick route to power because in their minds it is an entitlement.
-Darryl


Ignatieff balks at joining NDP, Bloc

John Ivison, National Post Published: Monday, December 01, 2008


Liberal leadership candidate Michael Ignatieff is unlikely to support the coalition deal being negotiated by lame duck leader Stephane Dion -- a decision that would doom the opposition parties' attempt to bring down the government next week in a vote of no-confidence in the House of Commons.

A person close to Mr. Ignatieff said that any deal with the Bloc Quebecois and NDP struck by Mr. Dion would be a "poison chalice" for the next leader.

He said that Mr. Ignatieff has the support of more than 50 of the 77 Liberal MPs, so the success or failure of a coalition proposition will depend on how the leadership candidate views any deal.

Although Mr. Ignatieff has publicly maintained the official Liberal line that the government should fall over its handling of the economy, his supporters say any coalition deal with the left-wing NDP and separatist Bloc is fraught with risk. It would only take nine Liberals to be absent from the House next Monday for the government to survive, and the source said he fully expects a number of no-shows.

Liberal attempts to reach a deal with the NDP face a number of hurdles, not least of which is the New Democrats' insistence on a senior economic portfolio such as industry for leader Jack Layton.

The Liberals are equally determined that those economic jobs should be held exclusively by them. But one senior Grit confided that the internal leadership dynamic creates even bigger obstacles to an agreement than negotiations with the New Democrats.

The source in the Ignatieff camp said Mr. Dion is making all the decisions on coalition talks with the NDP and the Bloc Quebecois, and is not consulting with leadership candidates, Mr. Ignatieff, Bob Rae or Dominic LeBlanc.

"Dion is like Frankenstein's monster -- he's on the slab and just had a jolt of life injected into him. He's going full tilt ahead with this coalition but his caucus isn't going with him," the source said.

Mr. Ignatieff's supporters are aware that a coalition would be shaky, and probably short-lived. The Conservatives opened their war room yesterday, just in case the country is plunged into an election next week, and are already preparing to hammer the Liberals for striking a deal with the sovereigntist Bloc. "Ignatieff knows he will probably be leader next May, so why not do it cleanly and properly? What's in it for him to be part of this power grab?" asked one Conservative, who said he was also hearing from sources that Mr. Ignatieff does not want to be part of any deal.

Despite the increased likelihood that the government will survive the confidence vote, the coming week is still likely to be full of high drama.

Yesterday, the government continued its attempts to remove the irritants that provoked the crisis. The proposed ban on strikes for the public service was ditched, following the remarkable U-turn on the public funding of political parties issue on Saturday. Jim Flaherty, the Finance Minister, said yesterday that he will bring down a Budget on Jan. 27, although he stopped short of promising the kind of stimulus package the opposition parties have been demanding.

Scott Brison, the Liberal finance critic, said that the government's moves mean nothing. "We can't trust anything this government says anymore. We have no faith in this Prime Minister," he said.

The Conservatives hope that the focus of media coverage will now shift to the potential coalition partners and what the some Tories have been calling their " coup d'etat."

The allegation that NDP leader Jack Layton and the Bloc Quebecois' Gilles Duceppe held conversations about a coalition long before the current crisis offered the Conservatives the chance to hit back after days of being pounded over the political funding issue. They charged that the confidence vote is not about the handling of the economy or the government's fall update, "[It] is merely a trigger to execute a long-standing secret deal between the NDP and the Quebec separatists."

The Conservatives have alleged that the moves by the opposition parties to offer themselves up to the Governor-General as a viable alternative, should the government fall, are undemocratic. However, the Liberals retaliated by saying that Mr. Harper, Mr. Layton and Mr. Duceppe presented precisely the same proposal to former Governor-General, Adrienne Clarkson, in 2005.

The only certainty amidst the drama is that Stephen Harper has been wounded by his miscalculation. His reputation for strategic brilliance is in tatters and many Conservatives have started speculating about leadership challenges.


Final option: prorogue parliament until January 27

It is clear that Stephen Harper has lost the confidence of the House of Commons. Opposition parties have been planning a coup d’état since the results came in on the last election six weeks ago. Harper now has two choices. Give up power to a coalition controlled by Stephane Dion, the separatists and socialists or simply attempt to govern constantly under threat of a coup and as a result lose the right to actually govern due to the fact that a united opposition would constantly force his hand. We have made concessions, but the opposition will not back down. They smell power even if it is unearned, even if the government would be illegitimate, even without a mandate from the people. At this point we can no longer control what happens. It comes down to an election or coalition government sooner vs. later. Therefore Harper should consider two options. The first option prorogue parliament until January 27. This would eliminate the House of Commons until the Harper government has a chance to come back with a budget. The budget could address things such as the stimulus package, auto industry and neutralize opposition arguments for a coalition. It could also be positioned as an election document and platform for what would likely be an election campaign in short order rather a coalition occurs or not. It could also demonstrate that the coalition simply wants power at all costs. Finally it would save us an election campaign over the Christmas and holiday season. Harper has a second option as well and that is to gamble people are disgusted by this coalition and visit the governor general right now or before December 8. That would force the opposition to rapidly put together their common agenda, conclude negotiations and formally sign a three way pact that the opposition could govern. If they are bluffing or if the coalition talks break down; we are in an immediate election campaign and the people can decide if they want the separatist Bloc Quebecois in their government coalition during these economic times.

Personally if I was Harper, I would prorogue the parliament until January 27. I would then put together a well thought out budget on the economic crisis along with a Conservative vision for going forward that could be used in an election campaign. If most "lack of stimulus" demands are addressed by the Conservatives as dictated by the opposition, the argument for the coalition will disappear. At that point any power grab would be seen for what it really is - opposition parties overturning the results of the election campaign. There is no question we have already lost the confidence of the House and can no longer work within this parliament. The only choice that remains is to visit the Governor General now and avoid delaying the inevitable or otherwise prorogue parliament, come back with a strong budget and position ourselves in the best possible way against this coalition. Volunteers and the Canadian electorate should enjoy the holiday season. Obviously parliament is disfunctional with nothing getting done. It is time to prorogue parliament until January 27 to give us the opportunity to prepare a budget and plan to address this economic crisis while at the same time delaying the total disaster a Dion led separatist and socialist coalition would become. Prorogue or visit the GG now. The choice is yours Mr. Harper.
-Darryl

 

FREE HOT VIDEO | HOT GIRL GALERRY