|
|
|---|
Showing posts with label democractic deficit. Show all posts
Showing posts with label democractic deficit. Show all posts
Tuesday, 12 April 2011
Our pollsters often ask dumb questions, get confused answers, and publish the answers as if they have found out what Canadians think about what does or should happen if we have a minority government.
![]() | ||||||
| Balanced polling? |
LIKE IT? CLICK HERE TO READ MORE
Labels: coalition, democractic deficit, elections, polls
Thursday, 17 February 2011
![]() |
| Gilles Duceppe |
... for openly discussing the realities of Canadian politics:
As reported in Quebec’s French-language daily La Presse, the Bloc Quebecois has returned speculation about a future anti-Conservative coalition to the forefront of political discussion. The party has declared that it retains the right to support a coalition of parties in the event of another minority government. While no parties were named, based on current polling trends, that could only mean supporting the Liberals and the NDP to block the Conservatives from forming another government.
And the initial Liberal response is yet another pathetic bout of whistling past the graveyard:
On the other front, by musing openly about supporting a coalition with the Liberals, Duceppe has put the Liberals back on the defensive, with Montreal MP Marc Garneau quickly denying that the Liberals have any plan to form a coalition with another party.
What the Liberal party should have said in answer to the Bloc move to recognize reality, was to welcome Duceppe's statement, and state that the Liberal Party was prepared to form the next government of Canada should a Tory minority government lose a vote of confidence.
However, to the extent the Liberals would need support from other MPs in the House, such support would be welcomed provided that the Liberals were not prepared to take any steps to endanger the unity of Canada, nor to embark upon irresponsible economic steps which would hurt Canadians rather than help them.
And Michael Ignatieff could spell out a set of general principles which would govern a minority Liberal government (keep it short, keep it simple, keep it effective).
And we could then all sit back and watch the new Tories scramble around like headless chickens.
Friday, 14 January 2011
I believe he has, but only if Michael Ignatieff and Jack Layton stop dead in their tracks and consider the political implications of the latest statement by Harper on party financing, and the opportunity this has created for the replacement of a Harper minority government after the next election by a progressive-centre one.
This is Harper's latest statement on public financing of parties, from the Calgary Herald:
But on Wednesday, Harper said he still believes the system should be abolished. "I think we've been pretty clear that we don't think there's really strong justification for this direct subsidy to parties." ... Harper said it's clear that he couldn't accomplish this in the current Parliament because the opposition parties would block him."It will be a clear plank in our platform. But as I say, voters shouldn't hold out any hope that we're going to get any support to do this from the other parties."
Why is Harper doing this? The key to the replacement of the Harper right wing
LIKE IT? CLICK HERE TO READ MORE
Thursday, 18 November 2010
Harper, prime minister with a minority government, has used his newly-acquired majority in the Senate (courtesy of the Liberal Party) to stop legislation passed by the majority of MPs in the House. He claims that the legislation was "irresponsible" and his policy of walking in lockstep with the USA is a better one:
LIKE IT? CLICK HERE TO READ MOREThe bill was killed without debate — the first time in at least 70 years that the Senate has killed legislation from the Commons without a hearing, according to parliamentary experts.“What he’s done is morally wrong,” an outraged New Democratic Party Leader Jack Layton told reporters in the Senate foyer. “This is one of the most undemocratic acts we have seen in the Parliament of Canada . . . This Senate should be abolished. It should be ashamed of itself.”
Labels: democractic deficit, Harper, Ignatieff, Liberal Party, Parliament
Wednesday, 10 November 2010
Congratulations to Elizabeth May and a Call for Action to Messrs. Ignatieff & Layton
0 comments Posted by 2011 at 09:38![]() |
| Hat tip from Leonard Cohen |
Hat tip to drivingtheporcelianbus for bringing the latest on the court challenge to our antiquated first-past-the-post system to our attention.
Elizabeth May is to be congratulated for walking the talk of democratic reform by intervening in the court challenge to our election system:
Elizabeth May is to be congratulated for walking the talk of democratic reform by intervening in the court challenge to our election system:
Elizabeth May will be an intervenor in a court challenge arguing that the first-past-the-post electoral system contravenes the fairness required by Section Three of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Fair Vote Canada has also been granted intervenor status in the case. Spearheaded by L'Association pour la revendication des droits démocratiques (ARDD), a Quebec democratic rights group, the case (Gibb v. Quebec's Attorney General and Quebec's Director General of Elections) is currently being heard in the Quebec Court of Appeal, and is expected to go all the way to the Supreme Court of Canada.
LIKE IT? CLICK HERE TO READ MORE
Wednesday, 27 October 2010
With this program, The Cat would have voted for Rob Ford for Mayor
0 comments Posted by 2011 at 13:39Forgeddabout his roughness, his lapses with accuracy, his memory problems, let's look at what Rob Ford has promised to do.
There is a pretty good list set out in the Toronto Sun.
And The Cat likes a lot of these items.
As for those who are now saying that Ford won't be able to implement much because in Toronto a mayor is just one vote on the council, perhaps they should consider this: the wave that swept this guy into power is still out there, waiting for action. And any councillor who decides to oppose this mayor on some of the major items had better think very seriously about whether that wave just might change course a bit, and sweep him or her out of office come the next election.
Labels: democractic deficit, elections, framing, political reform
Sunday, 2 May 2010
Why there will be a Labour Government in Britain even if the Tories gain most seats
0 comments Posted by 2011 at 18:52A very interesting development is likely to take place on Thursday night this week, The Cat believes. Even though the Conservative Party might gain most seats in Britain's Parliament, it will fall short of a majority. It will then be up to Nick Clegg and his Liberal Party to decide who should form the government.
I am sure that the Liberals will choose the Labour Party to be the government, rather than the Tories.
Why?
Because the leader of the Liberal Party has a once in a lifetime opportunity to change the ballgame and benefit millions of frustrated British voters.
LIKE IT? CLICK HERE TO READ MORE
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)






