Showing posts with label Parliament. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Parliament. Show all posts

Friday, 27 May 2011

During a press conference, the issue of the referendum for independence of Quebec came up, and Jack Layton did a bit of dodging and weaving around the issue.


Layton walked a fine line in his speech to the troops, noting that Canadians "from coast to coast" voted for the NDP.

But he did not overlook Quebec, either.

"In this Parliament, we are going to work tirelessly to respond to their expectations," he said. "My message to Quebecers is clear. You can count on me to defend your interests."

Which Quebecers were you talking about, Jack?

Take an example to test your commitment that "Quebecers" can count on
LIKE IT? CLICK HERE TO READ MORE

Friday, 20 May 2011

This is incredible: some unnamed MPs or Senators seem to think that one candidate for the Interim Leadership should renounce any right to run for permanent leader EVEN IF THE NATIONAL BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND THE CAUCUS OF SENATORS AND MPS DECIDES IN FUTURE THAT THE INTERIM LEADER MAY RUN FOR PERMANENT LEADER.

Two down, Two left
This is a bit like expecting that one candidate (Bob Rae) to take a vow of silence, renounce the real world, hasten off to a monastery, and forget about having the same rights that any other member of the Liberal Party has.

Since when has the Liberal Party adopted a black balling process for Bob Rae?

Who gives any MP or Senator or Board Director the moral or legal right to decide to alter the rights of a particular member? Have we not a constitution? Does that
LIKE IT? CLICK HERE TO READ MORE

Thursday, 19 May 2011

Parliament is a place of symbolism. Today, the Liberal Party caucus said goodbye to Michael Ignatieff in the Railway Committee Room, its last meeting there. Jack Layton's NDP will be meeting there in future,  continuing a century old tradition as the place with the Official Opposition Party meets.


Railway Committee Room
The room is so-called because it was the meeting place of the Standing Committee on Railways, Canals and Telegraph Lines, which started life in 1867 and changed its name in 1965. Once the home of our Supreme Court of Canada, the painting The Fathers of Confederation hangs at one end and the Canadian Coat of Arms at the other end.


The NDP have earned their right to this room, having shattered the isolation of Quebec from active participation in our nation's Parliament rather than simply remaining as onlookers, and in  so doing the NDP has moulded the contours of our political landscape in ways unthinkable just a short week or two ago.  Their victory is a testament to the possibilities of hope and of change in our sprawling young country.
The Fathers of Confederation


LIKE IT? CLICK HERE TO READ MORE

Lot's of faux indignation amongst media and bloggers and politicians over Harper's decistion to appoint three senators, including two who ran for election to the House of Commons, and lost. To judge from the response by some, you would think that Harper had broken at least a handful of laws, and done something totally immoral and unprecedented.


Parliament
The Cat advises people to take a deep breath and think a bit before they do the Layton-kneejerk. 

Tories make sense:

The Tory explanation makes sense:

Marjory LeBreton, the government's leader in the Senate,
LIKE IT? CLICK HERE TO READ MORE

Monday, 9 May 2011

... for a year or two.

Let's not forget the momentous nature of the election on May 2 – from out of nowhere, it seems, millions of Quebeckers suddenly decided, over a week or two, to move from a party that was formed for the sole purpose of achieving the separation of Quebec from Canada.

And move they did!

So many that the separatist party was smashed to smithereens and might never arise a
LIKE IT? CLICK HERE TO READ MORE

Saturday, 30 April 2011

Where is Quebec leading Canada to on May 2? And why will most Canadians want to undertake that journey with them?

First the coalition, then the Royal Wedding – is the Brit example influencing Canadian voters? 

The excitement of the high drama in the UK after their recent election, with negotiations between the three parties ending in a five-year coalition deal between the Conservative Party and the Liberal Democrats, spilled over into Canada for a brief time, with bloggers and commentators wading in with comparisons to our
LIKE IT? CLICK HERE TO READ MORE

Friday, 29 April 2011

A big hat tip to Accidental Deliberations for adding a very important video from constitutional expert Peter H. Russell to their site – it's at the bottom of their post. CHECK THEIR POST FOR THE VIDEO OF THE REASONS WHY THIS CONSTITUTIONAL LAW PROFESSOR IS RECOMMENDING AGAINST A CONSERVATIVE MAJORITY.

Professor Peter H. Russell
LIKE IT? CLICK HERE TO READ MORE

Thursday, 28 April 2011

This election is a game changer for Canada.  What you do between now and midnight on May 2 can help change our country beyond recognition.


This is your chance to help that change along.

Why not give yourself Bragging Rights for being part of that massive change by doing
LIKE IT? CLICK HERE TO READ MORE

Tuesday, 26 April 2011

Your vote belongs to you, and you alone. It does not belong to Harper, or Duceppe, or May, or Layton, or Ignatieff.

On May 2, use your vote as a hammer.

Strike a blow for our democracy.

Hammer the man who leads the only party whose government has been found to be in contempt of our Parliament.


LIKE IT? CLICK HERE TO READ MORE

Saturday, 2 April 2011

Today the Tory Deputy Leader of the House let loose the dogs of war with his joking response to a serious question from a voter about our democratic rights.

Cannon & Baird and Contempt
In Ottawa two senior Tory ministers were slammed by a citizen for contempt of Parliament, and one minister slammed the House – including the Speaker – for a rigged vote.

The irate citizen mocked the Tories' "conspiracy defence" and said the contempt issue was the most important question of the election, which is being held at a time when hundreds of  people are dying for democracy in streets in cities all over the world.

This is a remarkable event, and a day that will long be remembered when historians ponder the 2011 election.

It is the day that the democracy dissents sweeping the world came to Canada.

Sheenagh McMahon - Canadian Hero
A solitary Canadian attended a Conservative Party rally and asked pointed questions of Conservative heavyweight ministers Cannon and Baird.

While brushing her questions aside, Baird said the decision was rigged, and in effect accused the Speaker of the House – a man he had praised a week or so ago, on the day the Harper minority government fell – of being biased.

When the Harper government lost a vote of confidence due to the majority of the MPs in the House finding it in contempt of Parliament, Speaker Milliken, ended his long term as elected Speaker of our House of Parliament.

This is how John Baird, Deputy Leader of the Conservative Party, praised the Speaker on that day:

Mr. Speaker, I am very privileged to rise today to pay tribute to a great Canadian, someone who will not be seeking re-election to this place after serving 23 years as the member of Parliament for Kingston and the
LIKE IT? CLICK HERE TO READ MORE

Wednesday, 30 March 2011

Now that Ryan Dolby has shown the way with his principled and courageous act to step down in order to maximize the chance to Turf-A-Tory, the following is a list from an earlier post of 45 ridings where it could be possible to ensure a Tory does not go to the Parliament they have been  held to be in contempt of.

The Cat urges the Liberal and NDP candidates in each of these 45 ridings to check the numbers and make a tactical decision to withdraw and throw their support to the candidate from the NDP or Liberal Party that won the most votes in the 2008 election.

The Greater Good:

The decision to maximize the Turf-A-Tory votes will be a decision to put country
LIKE IT? CLICK HERE TO READ MORE

Tuesday, 29 March 2011

If Stephen Harper wins a majority on May 2 he will be given the keys to our Parliament and be able to do what he pleases. He will be able to jam legislation through the House without any check from the Senate, which the Tories now control.

For four years he will be able to show contempt for Parliament each and every day.

He will be able to do these things (and much, much more):
  • Disregard the rights of our MPs to have proper information given to them in order to do their job properly and represent us, by refusing to vote his majority government in contempt of the House;
  • Prepare and pass budgets based on fudged figures, projections that do not show the true costs of major items, and optimistic estimates of growth;
  • Viciously attack and destroy any civil servant who dares to question any Tory initiative, including blatant breaches of our laws;
  • Jam through massive further tax cuts for corporations, and so "starve the beast" for the next 20 years, putting in danger payments to seniors, and our health care program;
  • Gut any regulations he wishes to;
  • Continue his shameful use of taxpayers' money (our money) to boost his party and his standing.
A Harper majority poses a major risk to my country.

Jack Layton has addressed the issue of how we can avoid a Harper marjority on May 2:

NDP Leader Jack Layton is urging voters to think strategically when they cast their ballots, so they can get rid of Stephen Harper as prime minister...

"The way to stop Stephen Harper from getting a majority is to take Conservative seats one by one, and defeat the MPs who are there. That's how you stop Mr. Harper from getting a majority," Layton said in Regina.

Jack Layton is calling on every voter who is concerned about Stephen Harper winning a majority and running unchecked over our rights and freedoms, and our democracy, to vote for country rather than party.

We can best prevent another Harper government by voting to defeat the Conservative candidate in our riding. And the best way to do this is to put country before party.

If in the 2008 election the votes won in your riding by the Liberal and NDP candidates were more than the votes won by the Conservative candidate, but the Conservative ended up being elected because of the split vote between NDP and Liberals, then you should vote for the party that won the most votes in 2008 so as to defeat the Tories. If that was the NDP, then vote NDP this time even if you are a Liberal. If that was  the Liberal Party, then vote Liberal this time even if you are NDP.

I am going to follow Jack's advice in this election, and put my country ahead of my party in order to prevent another Harper Tory government.

Thank you, Jack!

O, Canada, we stand on guard for thee!

Sunday, 27 March 2011

It seems that Harper did indeed discuss a coalition with the Bloc in 2004, according to a Tweet by Duceppe, but the three men who met in the hotel to talk about the Conservatives lead by now lame duck prime minister Harper on other occasions have said there was no talk of a coalition as such. 

Coyne writes that:

But what of the Conservatives? Weren’t they proposing a coalition themselves, via that notorious 2004 letter to the Governor General? No. 

While it’s abundantly clear that Harper was ready to replace Paul Martin as prime minister under exactly the circumstances he now denounces — making him not just wrong but hypocritical — it is equally clear he was not proposing to form a coalition. 


LIKE IT? CLICK HERE TO READ MORE

Saturday, 26 March 2011

Christie Blatchford gave young women some good advice in her article headed Auntie Blatch's treatise on escorts and Popsicles. In it, she spoke about a young woman named Michele McPherson, the fiancee of a former senior advisor to the Prime Minister Stephen Harper, Bruce Carson.

PM Harper and The Mechanic
Carson was the go-to man during his years in Harper's Prime Minister's Office, and was described by Macleans as one of the 12 most important people in Harper's office.

He was their fixer, the man you went to if you had a problem, and for this he was nicknamed The Mechanic.

Now it seems that The Mechanic might need the soothing advice of someone Like Auntie Blatch, if the advice given to him in this
LIKE IT? CLICK HERE TO READ MORE

Christie Blatchford offers in today's Globe & Mail some good advice to young women in her article headed Auntie Blatch's treatise on escorts and Popsicles

She introduces her article with a little bit of self-deprecation:

Carson, McPherson and PM Harper

Clearly, there are young women in this country in dire need of advice from a wizened crone who has been around the block once or twice.

Then she plunges right in, setting the scene:


LIKE IT? CLICK HERE TO READ MORE

Stephen Harper (the prime minister who has just been turfed out of office after the majority of MPs voted that they found his government in contempt of our Parliament, and for that reason voted that they did not have confidence in his government) is once again showing his contempt for the democratic rights of Canadians by his description of coalitions under our Parliamentary traditions.

The Problem:

Harper is deliberately distorting the true meaning of the legal position by claiming that the three opposition parties formed a coalition in their 2008 agreement. 

He is trying to inflame voters against the right of any party other than the Conservative Party to enter into agreements with the duly elected MPs of other
LIKE IT? CLICK HERE TO READ MORE

Friday, 25 March 2011

It seems that Stephen Harper, the disgraced prime minister of Canada whose Harper Government has just lost a vote of confidence after being found in Contempt of Parliament, shares In & Out ways with the former escort and now fiancee of Harper's former senior advisor, Bruce Carson.

The Mechanic, Ms McPherson & Stephen Harper
Judging by this, it seems to The Cat that Stephen Harper and Ms McPherson just might be the trendsetters in a whole new way of doing things, on the In & Out Model.

For Harper, In & Out refers to the infamous In & Out scandal launched by the Conservative Party during the 2006 election, which has now lead to charges against that party and the Tory Four.

Perhaps we can understand just why the Conservatives under Harper embarked on that scheme: after all, the rules just do not apply to Harper and the Harperniks, do they?

At least, that is what the Conservative party organizer in Montreal  responsible for the riding of David Marler told Marler when he felt very uncomfortable about being involved in the Tory In & Out scheme. Marler says the organizer told him:

Mr. Marler, said in his case it all began in December 2005 when he received a telephone call from Nelson Bouffard, a Conservative party organizer in Montreal responsible for his riding.

“He phoned me up and said, ‘I just want to let you know, that the party is going to deposit $30,000 in your campaign account in the next day or two and then withdraw it immediately. We just wanted to let you know that so you don’t fuss about it. It’s just an in and out.”

“I said to him, Well what’s that about? He said, ‘Don’t you worry about it. It’s just going to happen and it has nothing to do with you.”

“I said it does have something to do with me because that is my campaign account and I’ve got to make sure that it is managed properly.”

“He said ‘This is the party speaking, Mr. Marler. We do what we like.”

That was Harper's Conservative Party speaking: We do In & Outs because we are the Party, and we do what we like.

As for Ms McPherson, her In & Outs are of a slightly different sort:

McPherson also acknowledged her past work in the "sex trade." APTN had reported that she worked as an Ottawa escort who went by the name Leanna VIP...

Ms McPherson
Postings on adult websites suggest McPherson's moonlighting as an escort continued during the period she was signing the H20 contract toward the end of August.

On Aug. 16, just two weeks before she signed the deal, "Leanna" posted a message on the Canadian Escort Recommendation Board.

"Hi Gentlemen, I will be excepting (sic) bookings this Tuesday and Wednesday for both in and out calls .... This being the last two days, I have decided to do something different in my personal life and will only be offering only out calls from now on ... And only part time ..."

Ms McPherson and Stephen Harper – two people who do In & Outs.

Wednesday, 23 March 2011

... to avoid the contempt of Parliament vote during the Liberal no-confidence vote on Friday?

Tail between the legs to Rideau Hall ...
The Cat thinks there is a better than 50% chance that Harper will make a little trip to the Governor General tonight or tomorrow to avoid the vote holding his government in contempt of Parliament.

Knowing Harper, The Cat believes he will frame his request for a dissolution of Parliament and being based on the lack of any move by any of the three opposition parties to change their minds on the eminently sensible Harper budget, despite him having held the door  open for them to reconsider the folly of their ways.

LIKE IT? CLICK HERE TO READ MORE

The Contempt Party of Canada
Harper and his new Tories are running around town like chickens with their heads cut off, screaming that the coming election is "unnecessary, unnecessary, unnecessary".

"The parties of the opposition have a choice to make between two priorities: their ambition to have an unnecessary election or important measures to support Canadians and the Canadian economy," Harper told reporters on Parliament Hill.
Harper has also tried to control the narrative in the first and second day of his (hopefully) last budget, by insisting that the other parties have to explain what's
LIKE IT? CLICK HERE TO READ MORE

Tuesday, 22 March 2011

Ever since it came into power, the Harper minority government has struggled to come to terms with the fact that Canadians did not give them a majority in the House. 

Time after time, they have acted as if they were entitled to all their ideas, to all their programs, and to silent compliance on the part of the other legitimately elected
LIKE IT? CLICK HERE TO READ MORE

 

FREE HOT VIDEO | HOT GIRL GALERRY