Showing posts with label Hillary Clinton. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Hillary Clinton. Show all posts

Tuesday, 24 February 2009


Cannon meets Hillary Clinton

More evidence of the growing relationship between Stephen Harper's Conservatives and the Barack Obama administration. The November election will mean good things for Canada-US relations. Help is on the way in Afghanistan. Omar Khadr was discussed.
-Darryl

Update: Some video of Hillary and Cannon from today. Hillary is coming to Canada and is looking forward to skating on the Ottawa canal. Cannon briefs reporters on his meeting.

"In the light of Canada's experience in Kandahar, I also offered to share the lessons Canada has learned in Kandahar in the areas of training the Afghan National Police, border management and overall reconstruction and development work," Cannon said

Friday, 21 November 2008


Breaking News: Hillary Clinton Secretary of State

Hillary Clinton has accepted the role of Secretary of State in Barack Obama's administration. Congratulations Mr. Canon.

Details to come...

Update: Full Story from New York Times

Monday, 17 November 2008


Hillary Clinton would be a great choice for Secretary of State

I hope the reports here, here, here, here, here and here are correct. Hillary Clinton would be an excellent choice given her experience and relationships she and Bill have with world leaders. I hope she is in fact the Secretary of State. A meeting between her and Lawrence Canon would be great to see. It was also great to see Obama have a face to face meeting with John McCain today. I am also excited about rumours that California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger may also get a position in cabinet.
-Darryl


Secretary of state job Clinton's, if she wants it, reports say

From Saturday's Globe and Mail

Almost a year ago, Barack Obama was asked in a debate how he could rely on so many Bill Clinton-era advisers while still providing a break from the past, prompting his Democratic rival Hillary Clinton to burst out laughing.

Turning to face her, Mr. Obama deadpanned: “I'm looking forward to you advising me too, Hillary.”

Now president-elect, Mr. Obama it seems was not joking.

The pair took a secret meeting in Chicago this week, and Washington is abuzz with rumours that the New York senator will be tapped as his secretary of state.

The Globe and Mail

CNN quoted Democratic sources as saying Mr. Obama and Ms. Clinton had a serious discussion about the secretary of state job and that she left the meeting with the impression that it was hers if she wanted it. The Huffington Post blog went further, saying Ms. Clinton was offered the job and requested time to consider it.

But Mr. Obama also interviewed New Mexico Governor Bill Richardson for the position yesterday, media reports said.

Mr. Obama has also begun staffing his White House, transition team and economic panel with former Clinton administration insiders.

After a two-year battle in which each politician was accused of disrespecting the other, it appears that the Obama-Clinton rift is being repaired, one job opening at a time.

His transition chief, John Podesta, was Bill Clinton's chief of staff during the last two years of his administration. Mr. Obama's own newly hired White House chief of staff, Rahm Emanuel, was a senior Clinton adviser before winning a seat in the House of Representatives.

In fact, 31 of the 47 people named to Mr. Obama's transition team or staff have ties to the Clinton administration.

“He's definitely playing on good advice and past expertise and the most recent Democratic administration,” said Melissa Haussman, an associate professor of political science at Carleton University who worked on Ms. Clinton's presidential campaign. “The fact that Obama is inheriting problems that are the worst facing any president in the 20th century, he knows he's got to be prepared.”

Ironically, Dr. Haussman believes the new president learned that lesson from Mr. Clinton, whose own early White House staff was composed of some loyalists unprepared for the task at hand.

“They've got people with a whole lot of experience dealing with Congress, and that's something the Clinton White House was a little short on,” she said of the emerging Obama team.

While Mr. Obama's staff is drawing so heavily on administration insiders of the 1990s that Politico.com joked he is putting “the Clinton band back together,” the most symbolic gesture would be a high-profile position for Ms. Clinton.

Passed over for the vice-presidential slot, the primary runner-up campaigned for Mr. Obama during the general election and is regarded as a natural source of advice, expertise and political capital for Mr. Obama.

Already, she has been approached by Mr. Obama's wife, Michelle, for advice about raising kids in the White House. And now it seems Mr. Obama might be hoping she will help him contend with foreign policy as secretary of state.

But she is already being touted as a smart choice for the position, with an established international reputation that would help heal the country's damaged relationships abroad.

But what's in it for her?

Taking a position in cabinet means Ms. Clinton would lose her Senate seat and influence in domestic policy.

The past two secretaries of state, Condoleezza Rice and Colin Powell, have been lightning rods for criticism, a situation Ms. Clinton may not be willing to endure again.

“Let's face it, as first lady and presidential candidate she was open to a lot of barbs and spears,” Dr. Haussman said. “It's a multiplicity of considerations, thinking about where her talents lie and how much does she want to put herself in a high-profile position again.”

Wednesday, 29 October 2008

Hillary needs you to volunteer for Obama

Senator Hillary Clinton spoke on October 21, 2008 in Hibbing Minnesota.



Thursday, 28 August 2008

Barack Obama becomes the Democratic Party's Nominee


Today Delegates to the Democratic National Convention officially selected Barack Obama as the Party's presidential nominee.

Wednesday, 27 August 2008

McCain going after Hillary supporters with new ads

From the John McCain 08 Campaign...






Sunday, 24 August 2008

New McCain Ad: Why not Hillary?


Thursday, 21 August 2008




Obama needs Clinton or Gore as VP

Update: Obama has confirmed that his decision has been made in terms of who he will ask to be VP. He did not reveal his choice however. Prior to Saturday (most likely tomorrow) we should know exactly who that choice is. Obama met with Kaine earlier today and the leading three candidates still seem to be possible. As for Hillary, it is looking less likely, but who knows...maybe this is all a smokescreen for a blockbuster surprise where the "dream" ticket would become a reality.
-Darryl


The more I think about it, the more I cannot understand why Obama would name anyone besides Hillary as VP. Think of the situation right now:

-Polls are declining for Obama in key swing states, among blue collar voters, among older voters, among female voters and among Latino voters. His campaign has lost momentum and excitement. McCain has been effective in bringing Obama down to earth and portraying him as a celebrity without substance. He needs something to get off the defense and place a shot of excitement into his campaign.

-At the upcoming Democratic convention almost half of the delegates were initially supporters of Hillary Clinton.

-Obama is polling poorly on the economy and many Democrats and Americans associate the good economic times with Bill Clinton.

-The situation in Russia, Pakistan and Iran is quickly showing that national security experience is going to be crucial going forward in this campaign. No matter who Obama selects on his ticket, it will be obvious that national security and foreign policy will be major requirements to shore up Obama's lack of foreign credentials. The Clintons have a huge network of foreign contacts.

-Someone like Kaine is being considered because he might carry a swing state like Virginia. Would it not go with Hillary Clinton who has a 50 state organization from her primary campaign as well as her husband's presidency.

-Who can raise more money than the Clintons among the front runners currently being considered?

-Polls show that barley a majority of Clinton supporters will vote for Obama. Over 20% will vote for McCain. If uniting the Democratic movement is part of Obama's goal, how would selecting Biden address this situation? Clinton as VP could quickly unite the party and bring a much higher percentage of her voters into the Obama camp. No choice would unite the party more than Hillary who could instantly turn the Democratic convention into a unity love fest.

-If Hillary is snubbed, will her 2012 campaign kick off early?

-Is Obama prepared to spend weeks dealing with the controversy of selecting someone other than Clinton, become forced to explain why to the media and Hillary supporters and than attempt to unite a party full of disenfranchised democrats? Does he want to get so drastically off message with only 10 weeks to go with poor poll numbers despite the unpopularity of Bush?

-Who is a stronger campaigner on the VP short list than Bill and Hillary Clinton?

-Who has been more tested in the media and against Republican attacks than the Clintons?

-After the longest primary in history, almost a billion raised and spent, an organization in every state, similar views on the main issues and 18 million votes case; has Hillary not earned the number two spot? JFK selected his rival. Others have selected his rival. If Obama can work across the isle, show there is no such thing as a blue or red state, unite the country and bring out new voters; would it not be a appropriate to back that message up by showing he can work with Clinton despite a competitive nomination race?

-As potentially the first female president, does Hillary not help Obama's message of change despite her time in Washington as a Senator and First Lady? Initially Hillary was largely seen as Bill's husband. After her campaign, I think she has earned a legacy of her own and has proven to be her own person. Her time in the senate is far less than Obama's rival. I do not think Hillary represents status quo in Washington.

-Is Bill Clinton a liability? Hard to argue that when he obviously has ability to breakthrough in areas where Obama is trailing McCain. He will be hated by the far right, but how many of those voters does Obama expect to realistically get?

-Hillary and Bill are fighters. Who better to go negative on McCain than Hillary who proved to be a huge attack dog towards the end of her campaign. Her arguments were picked up and expanded by McCain. By joining the ticket, Hillary would reduce the damage of those previous attacks.

-Why would Hillary do it? She has already said she wants the job. She needs to pay off her debts. She is clearly the number two in the Democratic Party right now. The VP role would allow her to focus on health care or other issues she cares about from the executive branch.

-What would be a better way to overshadow the Republican convention than to name Hillary VP and steal the headlines for the next couple of weeks. Poll after poll shows that far and away Democrats prefer Obama to select Hillary. I think a major opportunity would be lost going with a lesser known candidate. With the exception of Al Gore, I cannot think of any name in the top tier that would be anything more than a total letdown if selected.

-If Obama really doesn't want Hillary (and many in his campaign do not), than at the very least he needs someone with the profile, organization, fundraising ability and experience. Al Gore could deliver that profile. Having said that, I think Obama should name Hillary as VP and then also his cabinet in advance. Can you imagine if he named Clinton is VP and then defined roles for Biden, Richardson, Gore, Powell, and others in a potential cabinet. The team around Obama would shore up his inexperience and minimize the risk that is holding many back from voting for an unknown quantity in the face of McCain's experience and track record.

-Conventional wisdom says that Biden is going to be the VP. The more I think about it, the more I am going to throw my money on a surprise with Hillary Clinton. Selecting someone else really doesn't make much sense and quite possibly could cost him the White House in 10 weeks.

I will be waiting for that text...

Darryl

Wednesday, 20 August 2008



Conventions could be a disaster for both Obama and McCain


Starting this Monday, the real election kicks off in the US as both parties are due to hold their conventions. While everything will be tightly scripted with both parties trying to demonstrate unity and
enthusiasm; there is potential on both sides to host a disaster based on who they choose as their running mates.

Rumors are that this Saturday, Obama will finally send out his text message announcing his choice for VP. He will then appear with that candidate in Springfield, IL at an event two days before the Democratic convention. In contrast, August 29 is rumored to be the day that McCain will select his running mate. Both candidates have the potential to divide their party with the choices they might make.

In the case of the Democrats, a long primary has highlighted the division between former Clinton supporters and Obama supporters within the Democratic Party. If Obama picks a running mate other than Hillary Clinton, many people are likely to be disappointed with the media doing everything they can to highlight division at the convention among Hillary's supporters. With polls so tight (yesterday's actually showing for the first time a McCain victory) some have speculated that Hillary should be the only choice Obama should be considering for the sake of unity within the party and also to improve the chances that most of Hillary's 18 million supporters will show up and vote for Obama. If he picks Hillary Clinton, issues associated with unity, appeal to Latino, Catholic, Blue Collar and women demographics combined with Hillary's 50 state organization could drastically improve his chances to win the White House. Polls taken siting Hillary as a running mate have consistently shown a bump in Obama's numbers. Hillary and Bill Clinton also offer the chance to shore up Obama's inexperience, an argument that has worked well against him in both the Democratic primaries and in McCain's current campaign message. If Obama selects someone other than Hillary on Saturday, he could face weeks of justifying his pick over Hillary in the media and within his own party throwing off his campaign message. With Hillary's name in nomination, one has to wonder if in the event she is not selected as Obama's VP, will her supporters show up in Denver disenfranchised and cause problems at least in terms of the optics of unity. If Obama picks someone other than Hillary, that person is going to be constantly compared to Clinton and if polls take a dive, people are going to question why he didn't put his ego aside and go with the "dream ticket". All indications are Joe Biden is most likely to be Obama's choice. If that happens (or worse if someone like Kathleen Sebelius is selected), this convention risks division and as a result could prove to be a failure or disaster. On the flip side, picking Hillary could prove to be a huge success for Obama. New interest and enthusiasm could likely be added to his campaign. Optics would show a united party. The event would close with Al Gore and Obama speaking in front of 70,000 in Denver. Is picking someone else worth the risk? Ralph Nader is predicting Hillary Clinton will be Obama's surprise choice and if that happens expect Democrats to truly get fired up. On the flip side, if he goes with someone like Tim Kaine, it is hard to see how such an unknown name would draw any kind of excitement or approval from grassroots supporters.

In the case of Republicans, John McCain already is going to have a problem with unity when he shows up in Minnesota. Ron Paul is holding his "rally for the Republic" and could draw attention away from McCain should a large and loud group of enthusiastic young people show up to the event. Paul has a loyal and enthusiastic following. The optics of his rival convention could provide a stark contrast to the official Republican convention where there is potential that McCain's VP pick could divide the party and fuel further unrest with core Conservative voters. Rumor has it that McCain's team is floating key pro-choice advocates Tom Ridge and Joe Lieberman as potential VP picks. Both would slap the Evangelical movement in the face and create a revolt from core Conservatives already not fully satisfied with McCain's track record and candidacy. Some pundits argue, that leaking Lieberman or Ridge is a way to pave the way for Mitt Romney. While Romney was once pro-choice, he is now pro-life. Romney is crucial for McCain on the economy, but his own prospects have been a source of concern among social Conservatives (see Huckabee's comments). Perhaps leaking Lieberman and Ridge is a good way to make Romney's candidacy more accepted by the Evangelical base. Now is not the time for McCain to play his maverick side. He needs a safe Conservative pick or he could face a major split in his movement and kill all the momentum he has gained in recent weeks. With Obama speaking in front of 70,000 people in a swing state, optics will be poor for McCain unless he can demonstrate some enthusiasm and unity among his own supporters. Two bad scenarios for McCain would be a selecting a pro-choice running mate or in the unlikely event that Ron Paul draws a larger and more enthusiastic crowd in Minnesota.

With such a short time before the election, mistakes could have a huge impact on the outcome. Within days we will see the VP picks of both candidates. Those picks are going to set the stage for the conventions. The outcomes of the conventions will determine who has momentum in the race for president. There isn't much time to reverse momentum or any potential errors as people pay more attention following the summer and voters begin to make up their minds for good. If either side is thinking of taking a big risk (McCain selecting a pro-choice candidate/Obama picking someone other than Hillary) they should think twice.

This will be a great week for anyone following the US election closely. Does anyone out there have any opinions on who McCain or Obama should pick as their running mate?

Thanks for reading...

Darryl

Tuesday, 19 August 2008


Obama should pick Hillary...will likely pick Biden as VP


Update: Michael Moore is pushing for Caroline Kennedy. Not a bad choice in my opinion. Kennedy is currently heading up Obama's VP search committee. Would she recommend herself?

Speculation is that Obama will name his VP this week, possibily as early as today and certainley prior to the convention in Denver at the end of the month. As we get close to a decision, I personally think it would be a huge mistake if Obama selects anyone other than Hillary Clinton. Here is a look at some of the top contenders at this stage of the campaign.

Hillary Clinton:
Pro - Has been tested on the campaign trail, is aware of the issues, brings Bill Clinton and his campaign machine fully on side, likely ensures her 18 million voters support Obama, provides instant unity and excitement at the convention and perhaps offers some experience to counter some of the weaknesses associated with Obama. Also has the ability to enhance Obama's chances in states like PA, FL, OH, MI and other swing states where she was successful in the primaries. Also brings Latino, female and older voters into the mix for Obama, demographics that Obama seems to be having trouble with. Avoids a letdown scenerio where whoever the VP choice is becomes overshadowed by the decision not to go with Hillary.
Con - Bill Clinton hanging around. Perhaps she will overshadow Obama. Questionable intentions regarding 2012. Nasty primary may affect personal chemistry between the two politicians. Comes with some baggage and hurts his message of change.

Joe Biden:
Pro - Vast experience on foreign affairs and defense matters where Obama is seen as inexperienced.
Con - Represents a state that only has 3 electoral college votes and is considered safely in the blue column. Perhaps lacks a profile compared to Al Gore, Clinton, Richardson, Edwards etc. who also ran in the Democratic primaries. Hurts Obama's message of change because of the amount of time he has been in Washington.

Evan Bayh
Pro - Popular democratic Senator in Republican Indiana. Could carry the state for Obama potentially. Former Hillary supporter that could demonstrate Democratic unity going forward. Has strong experience in foreign affiars and the economy. Adds to the generation divide because of his youth.
Con - Lacks charisma and isn't widely known nationally.

Retired Gen. Wesley Clark
Pro - Military experience would shore up Obama on national security. Hillary supporter that could promote unity. Although he has served in cabinet, he has never held elected office perhaps emphasizing Obama's message of change.
Con - Lacks campaign experience. No glaring liabilities though.

Chuck Hagel
Pro - Republican who opposes the war. Could emphasize Obama's message of bipartisanship. Good foreign affairs credentials.
Con - How will this go over with Democrats, particuilarily the moveon.org wing of the party?

Tim Kaine
Pro - Might put Virginia in play - a state Obama is targeting hard.
Con - Lacks experience, national profile and major accomplishments.

Bill Richardson
Pro - Could help with Hispanics, New Mexico and offers a wide range of experience including talking to dictators. Endorsed Obama late in the race despite ties to the Clintons.
Con - Could the "Judas" comment and the way his endorsement went down hurt party unity?

John Kerry
Pro - Ran a Presidential campaign in 2004 but lost. Has performed well as a surrogate. Experience with nasty Republican attacks. Could help Obama with experience and his three purple hearts and military experience.
Con - Lost for a reason. Lacks charisma and again could hurt message of change.

Wild Card Choices:

Al Gore - Has a huge following, environmental credibility and offers huge national profile. On the flip side Obama doesn't need further youth or Liberal support. Al Gore might turn off indepedent voters. Might not be interested in the role at this point in his career. Oscar and Nobel Peace Prize winner. Speaking on the last night of the convention.
Jim Webb - A good choice from Virgina. Lacks experience. Took himself out of the race.
Ted Strickland - Could put Ohio in play. Lacks national profile.
Kathleen Sibelus - Could put Kansas and the midwest in play and has a strong bi-partisan record. Is a female, but would her being named offend Hillary supporters? Lacks national profile.
Edward Rendell - Governor of PA. Could bring the crucial swing state in play. Supported Hillary. Does he have national profile though?
Sam Nunn - Good experience and is from Georgia, another state Obama is targeting that has been Republican in the past. Could help in the South and with independents. Is he yesterday's man though?
Chris Dodd - Good campaigner and has strong economic experience. Lacks profile and has been part of the Washington establishment for a long time.
John Edwards - Would have been a top choice a few months ago. Recent revelations in the tabloids though have forced him to fight to save his political career and have likely disqualified him for both the VP slot and a cabinet post.
Colin Powell - Ultimate military experience and well respected. Not clear if he will endorse Obama. Has baggage regarding Iraq. Republican would promote bi-partisanship but may not go over well with the Liberal wing of the Democratic Party.
Michael Bloomberg - Popular mayor in New York, Republican in name only and strong credentials on the economy. Could be a good VP pick for either side but seems to be leaning towards endorsing Obama.

Who Should Obama pick?
I think Obama could avoid a major mistake by selecting Hillary Clinton. I think on balance she brings the most to the ticket, promotes unity, has experience, offers fundraising and campaigning skills and assists Obama with Demographics and regions where he needs assistance. She has been tested in the media, campaign trail and fending off attacks. Fairly new Senator and Bill Clinton ultimately could prove to be very valuable both in November and in Obama's first term. If someone else is selected, Obama risks a major letdown, controversy and could alienate some of Hillary's supporters required in this tight race to win.

Who will Obama pick?
My money is on Joe Biden. His trip up to Georgia and recent campaigning could be a good indication he is the favourite inside the Obama camp. Offers good foreign affairs experience that can complement Obama's weaknesses and lack of experience. Had the best plan for withdrawl of Iraq in a responsible fashion. Has great relations with world leaders and the Senate. Although he sometimes speaks off the cuff, he offers a low enough profile to avoid overshadowing Obama on the ticket while at the same time is recognized nationally due to his time in the Senate. Likely a safer choice than other names mentioned.

Realistic Wild Cards?
Hillary Clinton if Obama gets cold feet naming someone else. Al Gore or John Kerry. Evan Bayh was considered the top choice by many pundits not long ago. Richardson has done well representing Obama in the media and on the campaign trail. Wesley Clark might be tempting given his experience in Kosovo and the current crisis in Georgia. Also don't be surprised if the pick is from Virgina. Colin Powell??????

Final Prediction: Obama picks Joe Biden this week despite pressure from Hillary Clinton supporters to go with the "Dream Ticket".

Thanks for reading...

Darryl

 

FREE HOT VIDEO | HOT GIRL GALERRY